Case Study

University of Hartford

Image
7f723dc7-university_of_hartford_hartford_connecticut_lccn2012631587.jpg

LED Lighting and Lighting Controls Upgrade

 

The Challenge

Established in 1957, the University of Hartford (UHart) is a private university of over 6,000 students in West Hartford, Connecticut. Its 350-acre main campus extends into neighboring Hartford and Bloomfield.

UHart has seen significant growth in the last two decades with the addition of its new residence hall, Hawk Hall, and the $34 million Integrated Science, Engineering, and Technology complex.

To keep up with the modern expectations of educational facilities and support its mission to become a future-facing institution, the University of Hartford committed resources to reduce its carbon footprint and encourage green solutions.

This initiative included a campus-wide lighting overhaul project, replacing old incandescent and fluorescent lighting with energy-efficient LED lighting.

UHart’s goals for this project included:

  • Increasing energy savings while lowering the overall operating cost of the University
  • Uncovering and maximizing available utility incentives
  • Improving in-house understanding of new control systems for lighting

Some additional project constraints included:

  • COVID protocols that limited accessibility to facilities at certain times of day
  • A diverse mix of building sizes, types, and age
  • Concerns over performing work on occupied buildings

 

The Solution

To achieve UHart’s goals, old incandescent and fluorescent lighting was replaced with energy-efficient LED lighting across the campus.

The Mantis Team installed occupancy sensors in areas that did not previously have them, significantly reducing light usage when rooms and hallways are empty. Additionally, the automated daylight savings sensors were installed to control the amount of light needed in a room while natural light enters.

Because we installed integrated control systems in conjunction with the LED lighting technology, the University gained granular control of its lighting and customized it to different individual parameters for the occupants of other rooms. (i.e., if one professor likes their classroom brighter or darker.)
 

The Results

  • Reduced its lighting and maintenance costs by nearly $1,000,000 per year
  • Saves over 5,000,000 kWh annually
  • Funded nearly 50% of the project costs through utility incentives
  • Total utility incentive was nearly $2.7 million, resulting in a net cost of $2.9 million and a payback period of roughly 3 years
  • Rooftop unit optimization using sensors to setback units, resulting in units running when needed vs constantly
$950,000

Total Annual Savings

$2,700,000

Total Incentive

5,400,000

Total Annual kWh Saved

3 Years

Project Payback

Ready to Go?

Have Questions? We're Here to Help!

Discover more about improving facility performance while reducing costs.

Similar Projects

Image
power line and pipeline
U.S. Energy Markets: Bending or Breaking?

At the heart of today’s energy debate is a tug-of-war between federal oversight and state autonomy. The original federal vision, shaped in the 1990s, aimed to create a unified national retail energy market. However, what has emerged is a patchwork of stat

Read More
Image
lights
Seeing Your Facilities in a New Light: Why Modern LED Lighting May Be Your Most Overlooked Efficiency Opportunity

Walk into a grocery store, hospital hallway, or research lab, and one of the first things you’ll notice is the lighting. Bright, uniform light supports food presentation, patient safety, or laboratory precision and shapes how people experience the space.

Read More
Image
handshake hard hat deal
Qualifying Your Efficiency Project for Utility Incentives

Our homes, businesses, schools, and public institutions collectively consume over 70% of the electricity and natural gas generated across the country. Improving energy efficiency in these spaces remains one of the most impactful, cost-effective strategies

Read More