Case Study

City of Lima Ohio

Image
lima, oh

Employ reverse auction for electricity and gas procurement in lieu of a costly RFP process

 

The Challenge

This small U.S. city—population 37,000—was burdened with high energy procurement RFP development costs and a limited pool of respondents and contract options.

 

The Solution: 

Cost Reduction:

Entice broad competition for the city to drive down year-over-year energy spend

Procurement Optimization:

Eliminate a costly RFP process by converting to a reverse auction for 3rd party electricity & natural gas procurement

 

The Results: 

2018 – 2019
Approx. $390,000 in term savings against previous contract spend

2020
Approx. $410,000 in term savings against previous contract spend

2023-2027 (extension of 2020 contract)
Approx. $552,000 in term savings against previous contract spend

Ongoing
Per RFP event eliminated: $100,000

2

Initiating Contracts

2

Contract Extensions

$1,652,000

Approximate Savings Over 10 Years

34

Suppliers Competing Across All Contracts

What is a reverse auction?

A reverse auction is a procurement method in which the traditional roles of buyer and seller are reversed, meaning there is only one buyer with many potential vendors.

These types of auctions have been employed by both government entities and the private sector for decades, offering a proven method to enhance the procurement of goods and services. Specifically, energy reverse auctions offer a transparent and competitive marketplace through which businesses and secure new energy contracts. Suppliers offer an identical product but can compete on their willingness to supply it at varying costs. 

Continue Reading 

 

 

How a reverse auction with Procure worked for Lima, OH

The City's in-house Request for Proposal (RFP) process during the mid-2010s was near the $100,000 mark for any single RFP issued. With limited supplier responses and a regulatory mandate to entertain at least three offers, the City was finding it difficult to engage competition and see fair market pricing.

In 2018, however, the City employed a hosted reverse auction for the first time, immediately eliminating half a million dollars in RFP development, administration, and review.

The opportunity to compete for this municipality’s business attracted triple the number of usual respondents, creating an environment for the sharpening of supplier pencils to a degree the City had not seen before. The result was a $390,000 in term savings over their previous contract spend.

In the subsequent years, the City has utilized the reverse auction process to continue to save on RFP costs and reduce their energy spend. With a new contract extension in 2020 for a term from 2023 to 2027, their 10 years of procuring electricity with reverse auctions is on target to have engaged over 30 potential suppliers across three contracts and save the City over $1.6M.
 

Ready to Go?

Have Questions? We’re Here to Help!

Discover more about improving facility performance while reducing costs.

Similar Projects

Image
energy meters
Four demand response trends every facility manager should know

Facility managers today are navigating a perfect storm of rising energy costs and growing grid stress. That's putting new focus on what demand response can deliver.

Read More
Image
Podcast Screenshot
Episode 1: Defending Facility Management Budgets

Kahleb Carradine breaks down how data transforms facility budgeting from reactive requests to defensible, business‑aligned decisions. A quick, practical guide for leaders aiming to plan with more clarity and confidence.

Read More
Image
roof with windows
From Portfolio Insight to Program Execution: Building a Roofing Strategy That Lasts

Data without a plan is just paperwork. Many organizations have, at some point, invested in a roofing assessment. They’ve received a report. They know which buildings are in poor shape and which ones are holding up. But when budget season comes around, t

Read More